Organizational Reward System And Its Impact On Staff Productivity

Original price was: $ 13.00.Current price is: $ 12.00.

A Case Study Of Nnpc Ph

Description

ABSTRACT
The main basis for wore Productivity and better performance is the satisfaction of this needs and ambition infact, what a worker expects from doing good job are job secretary recognition, praise and fair treatment, five supervisor and compensation and justice. The achievement of variables company, employee’s satisfaction also serves as an incentive to efficient and effective performance and probably higher Productivity.
The study therefore will attempt to charity the various reward system in the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation (NNPC) with a view to establishing their effect on the Productivity of staff. It also intended to find out whether there is any relationship between reward and performance of staff in the corporation.

TABLE OF CONTENT
i. Title page
ii. Approval page
iii. Dedication
iv. Acknowledgment
v. Abstract
vi. Table of contents

CHAPTER ONE
1.0 Introduction
1.1 background of the study
1.2 Statement of the problem
1.3 Objective of the study
1.4 Significance of the study
1.6 Scope of limitations of the study
1.7 limitation of the study
1.8 Definition of terms

CHAPTER TWO
2.0 Literature review
2.1 Historical overview
2.2 Reward scheme
2.3 Motivation and motivational factors
2.4 Motivation of the Nigeria workers
2.5 Organizational reward and staff productivity
2.6 Motivation and how they relate to the Nigeria work environment
2.7 Criticism of the above three motivation theories (Maslow, Herzberg and victor Vroom theory of motivation

CHAPTER THREE
3.0 Research methodology
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Population and sample size
3.3 Sources of data
3.4 Method of data collection
3.5 Validity and reliability of instrument
3.6 Method of data analysis

CHAPTER FOUR
4.0 Presentation, analysis and interpretation of data
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Method of data analysis

CHAPTER FIVE
5.0 Summary of findings, conclusion and recommendation
5.1 Summary
5.2 Conclusion
5.3 Recommendations
Bibliography
Appendix
Questionnaire

Additional information

Dimensions 5 × 74 × 9233 in